The leader of UK Conservative Party says Trans-Women and Trans-men can use Public Disability Toilets. Is they (I say they because I have no DNA test to say they are "Biological woman) needs to understand being "Trans" is NOT a disability. furthermore, because of this now very public debate on trans and sex, any person entering a disability toilet can be seen has fair game for the Far right minded thugs to violently assault. including any biological woman or man who have a physical disability.
Do the supporters of the Supreme Court judgement actually believe for one moment that any biological women (Including post operative transsexuals) are going to be safer from this judgement from males with penis.? Why are Trans people paying Tax to the thugs of Parliament. It is clear the Court judgement failed to hear from trans-people, and I mean the one's who have undergone surgery. at the end of the day it not making any safe space safer for anyone regardless of sex.
Kemi Badenoch has suggested transgender people can use disabled toilets after a Supreme Court ruling on gender.
The court declared that the words “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex.
The ruling has been interpreted to mean that transgender women, who are biologically male but identify as women, can be excluded from women-only spaces like toilets and changing rooms.
This has raised the question of which toilets they should use, which Conservative Party leader Mrs Badenoch said was “not as complex a situation as it’s often made out to be.”
“The thing that has created the biggest problem isn’t trans people, it is predatory men who used lax rules to say, oh, actually, I’m a woman now, I’m going to women’s loos,” she told ITV’s Good Morning Britain.
She was asked if transgender people should have separate toilet facilities.
“Most, if not all, organisations have a way of dealing with this. Not having gender neutral loos is one of the easiest things that you can do.
“Almost all businesses I see have disabled loos. They are unisex, different from gender neutral. Trans people can use those. But if you are providing a single sex space, it has to be a single sex space.”
She said she had put out regulations around toilets two years ago and that “lots of people laughed at the time”.
Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden has said the “logical consequence of the judgment” and the new guidance is that people will have to use toilets, changing rooms and other facilities of their biological sex.
But “there isn’t going to be toilet police”, he told the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg.
He said the Government will need to look to new guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) aimed at clearing up questions about what the Supreme Court judgment will mean in practice.
Transgender women “should not be permitted to use the women’s facilities” in workplaces or public-facing services like shops and hospitals, the EHRC said.
The same applies to transgender men, who are biologically female, using men’s toilets.
The watchdog also insisted that transgender people “should not be put in a position where there are no facilities for them to use”.
The watchdog is working on a more detailed code of practice following the Supreme Court ruling, which it said it aims to provide to the Government for ministerial approval by June.
